Pegahan — Saeed

The response was swift and violent. Plainclothes officers of the Ministry of Intelligence and the paramilitary Basij militia arrested Pegahan and his colleagues. He was not charged with violating labor codes; he was charged with national security offenses. After a closed-door trial widely condemned by international human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, Pegahan was convicted of “moharebeh” (enmity against God) and “assembly and collusion against national security.” He was sentenced to death, later commuted to a long prison term—initially 14 years, then extended to 19 years, plus additional sentences for “propaganda against the system.”

Because of the draconian nature of his sentence for non-violent labor activism, Pegahan has become a central figure in international campaigns against Iran’s human rights record. Organizations like Amnesty International have adopted him as a prisoner of conscience, arguing that he has used no violence and that his only “crime” is advocating for the rights of workers. saeed pegahan

In conclusion, Saeed Pegahan is more than a labor activist; he is a mirror reflecting the Islamic Republic’s greatest vulnerability. A regime that can tolerate intellectual dissent in Tehran’s northern suburbs cannot tolerate a bus driver who tells his fellow workers that they deserve a living wage. By sentencing a non-violent trade unionist to nearly two decades in prison, the Iranian state has inadvertently elevated Pegahan to a global symbol. He represents the unbreakable connection between the fight for democracy and the fight for bread. As long as he remains in Evin Prison, his silence is a loud indictment of a system that fears the power of a united working class more than it fears any foreign enemy. The question for the international community remains not whether Pegahan is a hero, but whether his sacrifice will catalyze a tangible change for the millions of Iranian workers he represents. The response was swift and violent

In Iran, labor unions are either state-controlled through the Islamic Labour Councils or effectively banned. Any attempt to form an independent collective is viewed through the lens of national security. Pegahan, however, refused to accept this reality. Alongside fellow activist Rasul Bodaghi, he co-founded the Tehran Bus Drivers’ Syndicate in the early 2000s. This was not a political party seeking to overthrow the regime; it was a grassroots organization demanding basic economic dignity. Yet, in the Islamic Republic, the distinction between economic justice and political subversion is often deliberately erased. After a closed-door trial widely condemned by international

Pegahan was transferred to the infamous Evin Prison, a facility synonymous with the suppression of Iran’s intellectuals, journalists, and activists. His time in Evin was a catalog of state-sponsored cruelty. He was subjected to prolonged solitary confinement, psychological torture, and physical beatings aimed at extracting false confessions. According to reports from groups like the Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI), prison authorities pressured him to broadcast a televised confession—a common tactic in Iran to discredit dissidents. Pegahan consistently refused.

As of 2025, Saeed Pegahan remains imprisoned, though his health is precarious. Periodic reports suggest he has been moved between wards of Evin Prison, occasionally granted furloughs due to international pressure, only to be returned to his cell. His comrade, Rasul Bodaghi, remains imprisoned as well.

However, the international response has been fraught with geopolitical complexities. Western governments eager to confront Iran over its nuclear program have often cited Pegahan’s case, while pragmatic trade partners have remained silent. Pegahan himself has criticized the selective nature of this solidarity, emphasizing that foreign governments should advocate for all political prisoners—not just those whose cases serve a specific foreign policy agenda. In letters smuggled out of Evin, he has consistently called for the release of all detainees, including those imprisoned for drug offenses or religious dissent.