They were wrong. By 1992, it was clear: the future was graphical. Released in late 1991, Lotus 1-2-3 for Windows was not a simple port. It was a ground-up rewrite that tried to have it both ways: the power and formula compatibility of classic 1-2-3, with the visual flair of Windows.
In the pantheon of PC software history, few names carry the weight of Lotus 1-2-3 . In the 1980s, it was the undisputed king of the spreadsheet, the original “killer app” that sold millions of IBM PCs to businesses. It was lean, it was fast, and it ran on DOS. lotus 1-2-3 for windows
Reviewers at the time often admitted: Its database capabilities (thanks to the built-in Lotus Approach query tools) were better. Its spreadsheet auditing was unmatched. Its 3D worksheets were more intuitive than Excel’s workbooks. They were wrong
Lotus Development Corporation, however, was slow to react. They were riding high on the success of 1-2-3 Release 2.01 and 3.0. Their customers—financial analysts, accountants, and business managers—loved the keyboard-driven speed. Management famously underestimated Windows, believing their loyal user base wouldn’t trade keystroke efficiency for a mouse and icons. It was a ground-up rewrite that tried to
Lotus’s Windows versions were consistently 12–18 months late. By the time Release 4 arrived, Excel 5.0 (with Visual Basic for Applications) was already setting a new standard.