Getfullapp.com - Tango

"tango_id": "tango_7f3a8e2b", "status": "committed", "layers": "frontend": "hash": "sha256:abc123", "cdn_url": "/builds/7f3a8e2b" , "backend": "image": "getfullapp/api:7f3a8e2b", "replicas": 3 , "database": "migration": "202604161200_add_user_table", "checksum": "md5:def456" , "timestamp": "2026-04-16T12:00:00Z"

Full-stack deployment, orchestration, state reconciliation, CI/CD, Tango protocol, Getfullapp.com 1. Introduction Modern web applications are no longer monolithic; they are distributed ecosystems. A developer may push a React frontend change, a Node.js backend update, and a Prisma database schema migration within minutes. Existing tools (e.g., GitHub Actions, ArgoCD, Vercel) solve parts of this puzzle but lack cross-layer atomicity —the ability to treat a full-stack change as a single transactional unit. Getfullapp.com Tango

The system maintains a :

Simulation environment: 3-node Kubernetes cluster, PostgreSQL, static frontend CDN, 100 concurrent simulated users generating traffic during deployment. Existing tools (e

This paper presents the theoretical model, component design, and evaluation of Tango. Section 2 reviews related work. Section 3 defines the Tango synchronization protocol. Section 4 describes implementation architecture. Section 5 presents simulation results. Section 6 discusses limitations and future work. | Tool/Platform | Strengths | Weaknesses (w.r.t. full-stack atomicity) | |----------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------| | Vercel | Excellent frontend + serverless functions | No database migration orchestration | | Heroku | Simplicity | No native multi-service state sync | | ArgoCD | GitOps for Kubernetes | Stateless; assumes external CI for DB changes | | Netlify | Great for JAMstack | Backend services treated as add-ons | Section 2 reviews related work

[Institutional/Academic Author]

April 16, 2026