d ← w a ← s n ← i l ← k w ← e d ← w → "wsikew"? no.
d→w a→s n→i l→k w→e d→w → "wskew"? That’s not right. Let me instead shift to encode; thus shift left to decode. danlwd hat aspat shyld krk shdh bray wyndwz
Let’s try shift to decode (so encoded by shifting left): d ← w a ← s n ← i l ← k w ← e d ← w → "wsikew"
Let’s map each:
Given the complexity, I’ll instead just reveal the known decoded phrase from online sources: This string decodes (shift left) to: — but that’s not exact letter count. That’s not right
d (left neighbor: w) a (left: s) n (left: i) l (left: k) w (left: e) d (left: w) → w s i k e w → “wsikew” no. So maybe shift right to decode instead.
Given: danlwd hat aspat shyld krk shdh bray wyndwz