Point ( Q ) via homothety at ( A(2,0) ): [ Q = A + \frac32(P - A) = \left(2 + \frac32(x_0 - 2), \ 0 + \frac32(y_0 - 0)\right). ] So [ Q = \left( 2 + \frac32x_0 - 3, \ \frac32y_0 \right) = \left( \frac32x_0 - 1, \ \frac32y_0 \right). ]
( |t_1 - t_2| = \frac\sqrt\Delta ), where ( \Delta = (-2m)^2 - 4(1+m^2)(-35) = 4m^2 + 140(1+m^2) = 4m^2 + 140 + 140m^2 = 144m^2 + 140 ). So ( |t_1 - t_2| = \frac\sqrt144m^2 + 1401+m^2 ). Thus [ \textArea(m) = 2m \cdot \frac\sqrt144m^2 + 1401+m^2. ] Apotemi Yayinlari Analitik Geometri
Actually my earlier derivative error: Let’s test numeric: m=1: t^2 coeff 2, -2t -35=0 → t = [2 ± √(4+280)]/4 = [2 ± √284]/4 ≈ (2±16.85)/4 → t1≈4.71, t2≈-3.71. Area=2 1 |4.71+3.71|=2 8.42=16.84. m=0.1: t coeff? (1+0.01)=1.01, -0.2t -35=0, Δ=0.04+141.4=141.44, √≈11.89, |t1-t2|=11.89/1.01≈11.77, Area=2 0.1*11.77≈2.35 — smaller. Yes, decreasing to 0. So indeed infimum 0. Point ( Q ) via homothety at (
Thus final: minimal area 0 as m→0, but triangle degenerates. For non-degenerate, no minimum, but if they ask for minimizing area among non-degenerate, it's arbitrarily small. So ( |t_1 - t_2| = \frac\sqrt144m^2 + 1401+m^2 )
Set numerator=0: ( (288u+140)(u^2+2u+1) = (144u^2+140u) \cdot 2(u+1) ). Divide both sides by 2: ( (144u+70)(u^2+2u+1) = (144u^2+140u)(u+1) ).
Use ( x_0^2 + y_0^2 = 16 ): [ \left( \frac23(Y - 1) \right)^2 + \left( -\frac23(X + 2) \right)^2 = 16. ] [ \frac49 (Y - 1)^2 + \frac49 (X + 2)^2 = 16. ] Multiply by ( 9/4 ): [ (Y - 1)^2 + (X + 2)^2 = 36. ]
Set derivative ( g'(u) = 0 ): Numerator derivative: Let ( N = 576u^2 + 560u ), ( D = (1+u)^2 ). ( N' = 1152u + 560 ), ( D' = 2(1+u) ). ( g'(u) = \fracN' D - N D'D^2 = 0 \Rightarrow N' D = N D' ).